Legal Opinion
State v. Peters
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 17, 2005No. AC 25003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The acquittee, Philip N. Peters, challenges the order of the trial court committing him to the jurisdiction of the psychiatric security review board (board) for a period of fifteen years. He seeks plain error review of his unpreserved claim that in making the requisite findings for commitment pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582, the court failed to apply the statutorily mandated standards of General Statutes § 17a-580 as interpreted by State v. March, 265 Conn. 697, 830 A.2d 212 (2003). We affirm the order of commitment.
In June, 2001, the acquittee was arrested and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. MarchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. EdwardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. JanulawiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. MyersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. DyousConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.