Legal Opinion
Rocque v. DeMilo and Co., Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 12, 2004No. AC 23948PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This is an appeal challenging four interlocutory orders entered by the trial court on motions filed by the plaintiff, Arthur J. Rocque, Jr., the commissioner of environmental protection. The defendants Philip Joseph DeMilo and DeMilo & Company, Inc., appeal from the court’s granting of the plaintiffs (1) motion to substitute a party after the death of defendant Frank DeMilo, (2) motion to withdraw claims against Frank DeMilo, (3) motion to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaim and (4) motion for permission to withdraw counts one through nine of the amended complaint. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FindlaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pritchard v. PritchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. HansonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. MisentiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Town of Redding v. Elfire, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.