Legal Opinion
In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC's Application for a Second Driveway
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 18, 2023No. a230372Published
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A23-0372 In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC’s Application for a Second Driveway. Filed December 18, 2023 Reversed and remanded; motions denied Johnson, Judge Wells Township Resolution No. 2023-1 Mary L. Hahn, Hvistendahl, Moersch, Dorsey & Hahn, P.A., Northfield, Minnesota (for relator Stoick Creek, LLC) Jessica E. Schwie, Joshua P. Devaney, Samantha C. Zuehlke, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondent Wells Township) Considered and decided by Cochran, Presiding Judge; Johnson, Judge; and Hooten, Judge. ∗ SYLLABUS The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Amdahl v. County of FillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.