Legal Opinion
Town of Stratford v. Castater
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 3, 2012No. AC 33494PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant, Eric Castater, appeals from the denial of his motion for attorney’s fees. Specifically, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly concluded that the plaintiff, the town of Stratford, did not bring the underlying action in bad faith, (2) improperly concluded that General Statutes § 31-721 was inapplicable to the present case and (3) *537failed to follow proper procedure in denying him attorney’s fees.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts underlying this appeal are set forth by this court in Stratford v. Castater, 136 Conn. App. 522, 46…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burns v. AdlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Town of Stratford v. CastaterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Marcus v. CassaraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013