Legal Opinion

Town of Stratford v. Castater

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 3, 2012No. AC 33314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The plaintiff, the town of Stratford, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered in favor of the defendant, Eric Castater, after a court trial. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that its claim for money had and received was unavailing because the cash out benefits were authorized, (2) concluded that the payment was not detrimental to the plaintiff and (3) balanced the equities of the two parties.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following procedural history and facts, as found by the court, are relevant to our…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Stratford v. CastaterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Stratford v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. Stratford v. WinterbottomConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API