State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Arthur
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition?1 (2) Is a 30-day suspension an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
¶ 2 The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Robert H. Arthur [Arthur or respondent], a licensed lawyer, with one count of professional misconduct.2 The pretrial order consists of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ClausingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.