State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BAR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
OPALA, J.
1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition?1 and (2) Is a thirty-day suspension an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
T2 The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Michael C. Taylor [Taylor or respondent], a licensed lawyer from Tulsa, Oklahoma,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bosh v. Cherokee County Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.