State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Clausing
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? 1 and (2) Is a suspension from the practice of law for six months an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative.
*1271I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
T2 The Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar) commenced this disciplinary proceeding on 15 August 2008 against…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. SMITHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- In Re SpilmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HELTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.