Barnhouse v. City of Pinole
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, P. J.
This appeal arises out of an action for damages to real property and personal injuries resulting from soil subsidence. Appellants, plaintiffs below, are owners of single family residences located on Sarah Drive in Pinole. Respondents, defendants below, are: Earl W. Smith, Earl W. Smith Developers, Ltd., and Earl W. Smith Development Organization (hereafter collectively Smith), the developers of appellants’ lots and builder of their homes; and the City of Pinole (City) and the State Department of Transportation (State), the owners of public streets, highways and associated…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.