Legal Opinion

Barnhouse v. City of Pinole

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1982No. Civ. 50631PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, P. J.

This appeal arises out of an action for damages to real property and personal injuries resulting from soil subsidence. Appellants, plaintiffs below, are owners of single family residences located on Sarah Drive in Pinole. Respondents, defendants below, are: Earl W. Smith, Earl W. Smith Developers, Ltd., and Earl W. Smith Development Organization (hereafter collectively Smith), the developers of appellants’ lots and builder of their homes; and the City of Pinole (City) and the State Department of Transportation (State), the owners of public streets, highways and associated…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API