Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Kenney

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14886PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an interlocutory decree of divorce, from an order denying her counsel fees and costs on appeal and support money pending appeal, and from an order denying her motion for a new trial. The latter order is nonappealable and the purported appeal therefrom must therefore be dismissed. The remaining two appeals will be considered presently.

The action was instituted by appellant to procure a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. Respondent answered and cross-complained. At the commencement of the trial it was apparent to court and counsel that the parties had reached a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Vieux v. VieuxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Wahlefeld v. WahlefeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Estate of SillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API