Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Glassley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1949No. 17,813PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

The appellants Johnson and Johnson are partners. They brought a suit to enjoin the use of the name “South Whitley Neon Sign Company” by the appellees Glassley and Blue, who are also partners. The appellees countered with a suit to enjoin the use of the name “South Whitley Neon Company” by appellants. The cases were consolidated and tried by the court, who found for appellees and granted the relief prayed for.

At a pre-trial conference it was agreed that the issues to be tried by the court were:

“1. Did Appellants adopt, use, and conduct its business under the style, firm name and trade name of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKee v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hartzler v. Goshen Churn & Ladder Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kimmick v. LinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Vaughn Building Company v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baird v. HodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Long v. Magnolia Petroleum CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re Estate of CartmellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. North Miami Consolidated School District Ex Rel. North Miami Consolidated School District v. State Ex Rel. Manchester Community SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. County of Kings v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API