Legal Opinion

Roberts v. LaConey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 4, 2007No. 26376PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We accepted this declaratory judgment matter in our original jurisdiction, pursuant to In re Unauthorized Practice of Law Rules Proposed by the South Carolina Bar, 309 S.C. 304, 422 S.E.2d 123 (1992), to determine if respondent has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. We also granted a motion for leave to file an amicus brief filed by Bridgewood Homes, Inc. The matter was referred to a Special Referee, by order dated May 17, 2005, to take evidence and issue a report containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations to the Court.

The Special Referee issued a Report of Proposed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Boone v. Quicken Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  3. Pascoe v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC v. PeckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Andria Priestley v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API