Legal Opinion

People v. Fager

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 19, 1997No. 97SA43PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline case defaulted before the hearing board and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of the hearing board that the respondent be disbarred and pay restitution as a condition for readmission. We accept the panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1979. The hearing board entered a default against the respondent because he did not answer the formal complaints filed in this case. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. FritscheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. SteinmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. DugganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API