Legal Opinion

People v. Steinman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 13, 1997No. 96SA157PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The hearing board in this lawyer discipline case recommended that the respondent be disbarred and be required to make certain restitution before readmission. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the board’s findings and recommendations. The respondent failed to participate in the proceedings before the hearing board and he has not appeared in this court. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendations.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1952. He was immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.8, effective October…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. FritscheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. JamrozekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. People v. JenksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. KuntzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. HotleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API