Legal Opinion

People v. Townshend

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 24, 1997No. 97SA39PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline case defaulted before the hearing board and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of the hearing board that the respondent be disbarred and pay restitution as a condition for readmission. We accept the panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1986. The hearing board entered a default against the respondent because she did not answer the formal complaint filed in this case. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. FritscheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Jurgevich v. District Court, Routt CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. SteinmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. RishelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. KuntzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. In Re BilderbackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API