Legal Opinion
Grievance Administrator v. Lopatin
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2000No. 113250, Calendar No. 9Published
1Opinion of the Court
612 N.W.2d 120 (2000)
462 Mich. 235
GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Albert LOPATIN, Respondent-Appellee.
Docket No. 113250, Calendar No. 9.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Argued March 7, 2000.
Decided June 27, 2000.
Robert E. Edick, Acting Grievance Administrator, and Richard L. Cunningham, Associate Counsel Detroit, MI, for petitioner-appellant.
Lee R. Franklin, Detroit, MI, for respondent-appellee.
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
In this disciplinary matter, the Grievance Administrator, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC), appeals an Attorney Discipline Board (ADB) order reducing the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.