Legal Opinion

DeChant v. Monarch Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 14, 1996No. 93-2220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The jury found that Monarch Life Insurance Company acted in bad faith when it terminated Keric T. DeChant's total disability benefits. It awarded compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorney's fees totaling over $2.5 million. Below we primarily address Monarch's claim that the trial court erred in law when it found that Monarch had "repudiated" the policy and thus it had the discretionary authority to give DeChant a present value, lump-sum distribution of his lifetime disability payments. The court rejected Monarch's argument that DeChant was only entitled to a judgment requiring…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DeChant v. Monarch Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Baker v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Carr v. Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Caporali v. Washington National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Keithley v. KeithleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance v. ChorenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. James E. Kochanski v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Greenberg v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Sterling v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
  5. James E. Kochanski v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API