Carr v. Amusement, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Several issues are raised by plaintiff-appellant, the principal one dealing with the jury finding that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant.
Jury verdict.
This is a jury verdict which has the full approval of the trial court. It is not to be upset if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference supporting the findings. The plaintiff contends that the condition of the steps down which he fell constituted a violation of a safety order of the state Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations and, as a matter of law, of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Szafranski v. RadetzkyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Strack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Rosholt v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Umnus v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Eielson v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Fitzgerald v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Fondell v. Lucky Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.