Legal Opinion

DeChant v. Monarch Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1996No. 93-2220PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Monarch Life Insurance Company (Monarch) appeals from a judgment in excess of $2.5 million for bad faith and breach of contract with respect to a disability policy that it issued to Keric T. DeChant (DeChant). Two issues are presented. The first issue is whether attorney's fees and bond premiums incurred by DeChant in prosecuting a breach of contract and insurance bad faith action constitute compensable damages for bad faith. We hold that DeChant is entitled to recover attorney's fees and bond premiums in a first-party bad faith action as compensatory damages flowing from Monarch's bad faith.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brethorst v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Danner v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McEvoy Ex Rel. Finn v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wisconsin Retired Teachers Ass'n v. Employe Trust Funds BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API