Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Paul Revere Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2004No. 02-16501; D.C. No. CV-99-00154-SRBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Defendants, Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and its corporate affiliates (collectively, “Paul Revere”), appeal from the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff Gary Green-berg’s (“Greenberg”) claim of bad faith termination of disability benefits. Paul Revere argues that the district court committed various evidentiary errors, misinterpreted the type of damages available under Arizona law, and allowed an impermissible award of punitive damages. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the judgment.
I. The district court’s evidentiary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Fair Housing of Marin, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Jack Combs, D.B.A. Waters Edge ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sterling v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Clark v. Chrysler CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Dorothy Clark v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Dorothy Clark v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Lewis v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.