Legal Opinion
Cuyamaca Water Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1924No. S. F. No. 11138PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent all of the judges of the superior court of San Diego County from proceeding in a certain cause pending in that court wherein the city of San Diego is plaintiff and the petitioners herein are defendants. The sole ground for the application is the claim of a disqualifying interest possessed by the respondent judges under subdivision 1 of section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that no judge shall sit or act in any action or proceeding “in which he is interested.” A general demurrer has been interposed to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Spires v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.