Legal Opinion

Douglas v. J. C. Penney Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1984No. 837SC364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Claimant, in her sole assignment of error, excepts to the factual findings and legal conclusion of the Employment Security Commission. On appeal, our scope of review is to determine:(1) whether there was evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact; and(2) whether the facts found support the Commission’s conclusions of law and resulting decision.

Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison, 305 N.C. 373, 289 S.E. 2d 357 (1982).

The Employment Security Commission made the following findings of fact:

1. Claimant last worked for J. C. Penney Company on April 12,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Matter of CantrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Mayhew Electric Co. v. CarrasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Smith v. Kinder Care Learning Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Smith v. Spence & SpenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Guilford County v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API