Legal Opinion
Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 30, 1982No. 154A81PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether claimant’s unexcused absence from work on 16 February 1980, which *375violated her employer’s rule and which was due to her inability to secure child care, constituted “misconduct” connected with her work so as to disqualify her for unemployment compensation benefits.
G.S. 96-14(2), in part, provides:
An individual shall be disqualified for benefits . . . if it is determined by the Commission that such individual is, at the time such claim is filed, unemployed because he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work.
This…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Kindrew v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kelleher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.