Legal Opinion

Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1985No. 60013PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

Appellant, Carolyn Vester, appeals to this Court, under the provisions of 40 O.S. 1981 § 2-610(3), from a judgment of the district court affirming the determination of the Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission that appellant had been discharged for misconduct connected with her work and was therefore disqualified for unemployment benefits by 40 O.S.1981 § 2-406.

Appellant initially filed a claim for unemployment benefits. Notice of this claim was given to appellant’s last employer, ap-pellee The Charles Machine Works, Inc. (CMW). By letter, CMW…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Wheeler v. ArriolaMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Spaulding v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Garfield v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Garden View Care Center, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Farm Fresh Dairy, Inc. v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Giovanoni v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Grace Drilling Co. v. NovotnyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Independent School District No. 1 v. LoganCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API