Legal Opinion
Aikens v. Banana Republic, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 8, 1995No. Civ. A. H-93-3735PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant Banana Republic, Inc.’s (“Banana Republic”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 11). De fendant seeks summary judgment on Rehnee Aikens (“Aikens”) claims of discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”).
Having reviewed the motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, this court is of the opinion that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.
I. Background.
On August 27,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Daigle v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Pegues v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Hutchinson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Oswalt v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1995
- Gormley v. Coca-Cola EnterprisesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.