Legal Opinion
Gormley v. Coca-Cola Enterprises
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 2005No. 28,441PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Chief Justice.
{1} In this employment dispute involving a claim of constructive discharge, the Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of the employer, Coca-Cola Enterprises (Defendant). On certiorari, we conclude, as a question of first impression in New Mexico, that Don Gormley (Plaintiff) has not shown that his working conditions rose to the level necessary to support a claim of constructive discharge. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs constructive discharge claim.
BACKGROUND
{2} We take the following background from the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Woodward v. City of WorlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. BPLW Architects & Engineers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Montgomery v. Lomos Altos, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Talbott v. Roswell Hospital Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. Granillo-MaciasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Miller v. Automobile Club of New Mexico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.