Legal Opinion
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1986No. C7-85-418PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The University of Minnesota brought this action for royalties and specific performance against Medical Incorporated, its licensee under a patent licensing agreement. The jury found the University was entitled to the royalties and also made findings from which the trial court granted specific performance. Medical claims the trial court committed a number of errors requiring either an amended judgment or a new trial. The University seeks review of the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorney’s fees and its denial of prejudgment interest for the period from October…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matter of Trusts Created by HormelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. MondryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Green v. City of Coon RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Erickson v. Commissioner of the Department of Human Services for the StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Saudi American Bank v. AzhariCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.