Legal Opinion
City of Savage v. Formanek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1990No. C3-90-110PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant, City of Savage, appeals from a judgment voiding its contract with respondents, Formaneks, and excusing respondents from further performance because the agreement was unenforceable.
FACTS
Respondents, the Formaneks, have owned land in the City of Savage since 1959. In 1980, the City of Savage (City) started planning an industrial development project (Project) that included twenty acres of land owned by the Formaneks. The Project area, along with much of the land along the Minnesota River in Savage, is under the authority of the Army Corps of Engineers. This means…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Georgopolis v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Winter v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Dahlheimer v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Viking Supply, a Subsidiary of Gerald F. Ogren, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. National Cart Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Beihua Sheng, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Pieper, Inc. v. Land O'Lakes Farmland Feed, Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Swenson v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.