Martinelli v. Hogrefe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover the sum of $500 based upon a complaint for money had and received in connection with a transaction for the purchase of real estate by plaintiff from the defendants. Plaintiff, appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants.
On July 11, 1925, the parties entered into a written agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to buy from defendants certain real property situated at the northeast corner of Francisco and Polk Streets in San Francisco. Of the agreed purchase price of $17,500, five hundred dollars was paid at the time of the contract; and it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Newell v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- List v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wilson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hunt v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Schwartz v. TeuniszCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Young Et Ux. v. Hansen Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.