Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Mahoney
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1947No. Civ. 13503PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBbay, J.
The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants, decreeing specific performance of a written contract for the sale of certain real property, including the home thereon, awarding damages in the sum of $300 for use and occupancy, and the sum of $75 to compensate for a partially ineompete bathroom.
The contract upon which this action is based was furnished and filled out by defendants' real estate agent, and is entitled “Deposit Beceipt for Purchase of Beal Property.” The receipt portion is signed “William Nock Company Real Estate Broker by M. J. Scotto,” is dated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bourdieu v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Kelso v. UlrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Loughan v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Crowell v. BralyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Bell v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.