Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Teunisz
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1946No. Civ. No. 15340Published
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, after trial before the court without a jury, in an action to recover commissions allegedly due under the terms of a sales manager’s contract for the sale of franchises covering new type milk bottle patents owned by defendants and known as the “Modern Top Milk Bottle Combination, ’ ’ defendants appeal.
The material portion of the contract between plaintiff and defendants is as follows:
Date: May 25, 1939
Position: Sales Manager
Commissions: A. Personal Franchise Commission of 25 per cent upon the gross proceeds received by the company upon franchises sold by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Central Oil Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mathews v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Martinelli v. HogrefeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932