Legal Opinion

Newell v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1919No. S. F. No. 8482PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Daniel C. Deasy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment upon a suit for money had and received.

The plaintiff, E. W. Newell, and the defendant corporation entered into a written contract on April 7, 1913, whereby the former agreed to purchase and the latter to sell certain real property for nine thousand two hundred dollars. Of this „ amount the sum of five hundred dollars was paid at the date of the agreement. The sum of one thousand five hundred dollars was due August 1, 1913, and the balance was to be paid in monthly installments of at least two hundred dollars. There was a provision for the monthly payment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Pearson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Butte Creek Consol. Dredging Co. v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. White v. MasseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Mintle v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Anderson v. HurlbertOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Jones v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API