Legal Opinion

Gentis v. Safeguard Business Systems, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1998No. B110351PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

Defendants, San Jacinto Holdings, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary, Safeguard Business Systems, Inc. (Safeguard), appeal from a judgment. The judgment declared Safeguard to be a franchisor under the California *1297Franchise Investment Law (CFIL), Corporations Code section 31000 et seq.1 Safeguard manufactures and sells recordkeeping systems and office products. The plaintiffs are members of a class of Safeguard’s current and former distributors. Safeguard contends the facts as found by the trial court were insufficient as a matter of law to meet the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. BementCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. HolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. StampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. UribeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API