Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Bement

California Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 2005No. S115823PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this action for recovery of unpaid overtime compensation, the question presented is whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action against any of eight individuals who were officers or directors and shareholders of the Delaware corporation, or its California subsidiary, that owns the automobile painting business for which he formerly worked. The Court of *1082Appeal upheld the trial court’s sustaining of a demurrer. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Background

Plaintiff Steven Reynolds, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated,1 alleges he was employed by…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Networks Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API