People v. Holford
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MURRAY, J.
Defendant Curtis Holford, a registered sex offender, was convicted by jury of possession of child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11) for his possession of a video file on a hard drive found in his possession. Following a bifurcated hearing, the trial court found that defendant previously had been convicted of a strike offense within the meaning of the “Three *159Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and that he had also served two prior prison terms (id.., § 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of 14 years in state prison…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- People v. Kerley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. VelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Vela, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.