Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2014No. S204543PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Franchising, especially in the fast-food industry, has become a ubiquitous, lucrative, and thriving business model. This contractual arrangement benefits both parties. The franchisor, which sells the right to use its trademark and comprehensive business plan, can expand its enterprise while avoiding the risk and cost of running its own stores. The other party, the franchisee, independently owns, runs, and staffs the retail outlet that sells goods under the franchisor’s name. By following the standards used by all stores in the same chain, the self-motivated franchisee profits…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Darryl Williams v. Jani King of Philadelphia IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Silva v. See's Candy Shops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Ochoa v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Barenborg v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API