Legal Opinion
Falahati v. Kondo
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 2005No. B176988PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Shinji Kondo appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate and set aside his default and the default judgment against him. We conclude the trial court erred in entering a default and default judgment against Kondo and erred again in denying his motion to vacate them.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Plaintiffs’ original verified complaint in this action named a number of defendants including Kondo and sought damages for intentional interference with economic relationship and prospective economic advantage, defamation, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unfair business…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. AliceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pyle, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People ex rel. Reisig v. Broderick BoysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Airs Aromatics, LLC v. CBL Data Recovery Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.