Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Reisig v. Broderick Boys
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 2007No. C051707PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
By default the Yolo County District Attorney obtained a permanent injunction against the Broderick Boys, a street gang. Four men served with the injunction moved to set it aside, alleging the injunction was *1511void for lack of proper notice. The trial court found they lacked standing to attack the injunction because they did not admit gang membership, and they appealed.
The evidence reveals a level of gang criminality plaguing West Sacramento which might well justify injunctive relief. (See People ex rel. Gallo v. Acuna (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1090 [60 Cal.Rptr.2d 277, 929 P.2d 596].)
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- TRACKMAN v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People Ex Rel. Totten v. CHIQUESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People Ex Rel. Reisig v. AcunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Andre Flowers v. DancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.