Legal Opinion

People v. Alice

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 2007No. S144501PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Court of Appeal violated Government Code section 68081 by holding that the People’s appeal in this case was authorized by Penal Code section 1238, subdivision (a)(10) as an appeal from an unlawful sentence, because the parties had neither proposed nor addressed this issue in their briefs. The Court of Appeal compounded this error by denying defendant’s petition for rehearing on that basis. We further hold that the appeal in this case from the order setting aside one count of the information under Penal Code section 995 was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV TRANSP.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. Manuel G.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. FeyrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Bains v. MooresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Postal Instant Press, Inc. v. Kaswa Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. ScarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API