Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Barker
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1915No. Civ. No. 1561PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County and from an order denying a new trial. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to quiet title, the complaint being in the usual form, alleging title in fee vested in plain tiffs and the assertion by defendants of an adverse invalid claim to an interest in the property.
Judgment went for plaintiffs, from which, and an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
The land, situated in the city of Santa Barbara, is a triangular-shaped parcel described in the complaint as follows:
“Beginning at a point which bears south 41%° west 60 feet from the south corner of block No. 365, of said city of Santa Barbara, as shown on the official map…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Den Ex Dem. Harry v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
- Kimball v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Davis v. Commonwealth Land & Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1905
- Stoll v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myrick v. PeetMontana Supreme Court · 1919
- Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Swarzwald v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Napier v. Northland Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Matteson v. McCartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.