Legal Opinion

Matteson v. McCarty

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 3709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONCUR, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that respondents are the' owners and entitled to the possession of certain real property described in the complaint herein. There is no substantial controversy as to the facts.

The action was commenced on the third day of June, 1926. It appears that on and prior to the twentieth day of July, 1917, Lewis W. Mustoe and Polly J. Mustoe were the owners of certain described real property in the county of Stanislaus, state of California, bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit:

“Beginning at a point bearing north 11.94…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Curtis v. UptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leoke v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Ganiats Construction, Inc. v. HesseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Autry v. PattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API