Matteson v. McCarty
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MONCUR, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that respondents are the' owners and entitled to the possession of certain real property described in the complaint herein. There is no substantial controversy as to the facts.
The action was commenced on the third day of June, 1926. It appears that on and prior to the twentieth day of July, 1917, Lewis W. Mustoe and Polly J. Mustoe were the owners of certain described real property in the county of Stanislaus, state of California, bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit:
“Beginning at a point bearing north 11.94…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Curtis v. UptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leoke v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Ganiats Construction, Inc. v. HesseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Autry v. PattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939