Legal Opinion

Bridges v. Price

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1928No. Docket No. 6567PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant Continental Casualty Company from a judgment in favor of plaintiff upon a broker’s bond given by appellant under the provisions of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673), as surety for defendant Price. The evidence showed that on September 29, 1925, respondent Bridges delivered to one Ormond, as agent for Price, 210 shares of capital stock of National Automatic Music Company, to be exchanged for 336 shares of Monolith Portland Cement Company stock. Subsequently Price admitted to Bridges that he had sold his Music Company stock…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Clar v. Board of Trade of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Bank of America v. DowdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Sukut-Coulson, Inc. v. Allied Canon Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API