Legal Opinion

Stoll v. Beecher

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1892No. 14462PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action to recover possession of a tract of land in Los "Angeles County. It is described in the complaint and in the judgment as follows: “All that certain tract of land in said county lying between Promenade Avenue on the east, and the line of ordinary high-water mark of the Pacific Ocean on the west, and between the lines of Ocean Avenue on the south, and Front Street on the north, according to the map of South Santa Monica, made by Rumble and Gaertner, surveyors, .... to which map reference is made for further description and certainty; the lines of said Ocean Avenue and of said…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schumann v. KarrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake R.R.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Garrard v. Silver Peak MinesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  4. Hunt v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API