Legal Opinion

Duksa v. City of Middletown

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 1984No. 9654PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

This is the second appeal in this case and certain material facts outlined in the earlier opinion need not be repeated here. See Duksa v. Middletown, 173 Conn. 124, 376 A.2d 1099 (1977) (Duksa I). In 1970, the plaintiff owned a farm of about 100.5 acres in a part of the defendant city of Middle-town (city) zoned for industry. In that year he granted the city an easement and right of way for a sewer across his land in return for the right to tie into the sewer without cost. The permanent sewer easement occupies 2.1 acres with approximately 1200 feet running in a north-south direction. There…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. United States v. PartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. In re Ralph M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API