United States v. Partin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellants Partin, Russell, and Sykes were convicted in three separate trials, and Don and Hugh Marionneaux in a fourth, of conspiring to obstruct the due administration of justice.1 Because the conviction of each defendant was based on the same three count indictment, and because some of the appeals involve common issues, we consolidated the appeals for ar*625gument and decision. For the reasons stated in the opinion that follows, we must reverse the convictions of Partin. We affirm as to the other four appellants.
I. BACKGROUND AND CHRONOLOGY.
The events…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Alexander DurriveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.