Atlantic Richfield Co. v. City of Bethlehem
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
Atlantic Richfield Company (Arco) has appealed to us from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County which sustained a preliminary objection “concerning res judicata” and dismissed Arco’s complaint in mandamus. Judgment was entered in favor of the “defendants.”1
Before the merits of this matter can be addressed, it is necessary to review the rather tortured procedural history of this case.
In 1978, Arco, through a named individual identified as its agent, applied for a special exception to expand its lawful nonconforming use of its property as a service…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Whitford Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Borough of LansdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grim v. Borough of BoyertownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- 813 Associates v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Karl Smith Development Co. v. Borough of AspinwallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Serban v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Northwestern Lehigh School District v. Commonwealth, Agricultural Lands Condemnation Approval BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.