Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Borough of Lansdale

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1981No. 1916 and 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, sitting in equity whereby the court below reformed a contract entered between the parties hereto. Both parties have appealed the lower court’s adjudication.

Philadelphia Electric Company, hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff, initiated this action in equity in the court below seeking the reformation of a contract entered into with The Borough of Lansdale, the defendant, by which the plaintiff agreed to supply the defendant with electrical power which the defendant would then…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Grant v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Utah Dept. of Admin. Serv. v. Pub. Serv. Com'nUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Frederick v. American Hardware Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. National Railroad Passenger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API