Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1415 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
On July 27, 1979, the Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) filed Supplement No. 6 to Tariff Electric-Pa. P.U.C. No. 25, designed to produce additional annual revenues from PECO’s electric service of $122,731,000, based on a future test year ending March 31, 1980. Supplement No. 6 was to become effective on September 25,1979. The PUC suspended operation of the proposed rates and ordered that an investigation and hearing be conducted to determine the lawfulness of the proposed rates, at R.I.D. 865.
Twenty-nine days of evidentiary hearings and five public comment hearings…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Helmig v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Thompson v. Karastan Rug MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- In Re Clinton Centrifuge, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Linnen v. ArmainisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.