Legal Opinion

813 Associates v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1282 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

This appeal is from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which upheld an order of the Zoning Hearing Board of Springfield Township (Board). The Board denied the application of the appellants, 813 Associates, for a variance pursuant to Section 114-61 of the Springfield Township Zoning Code.

The appellant is the owner of a lot at 813 Bethlehem Pike, Erdenheim, Springfield Township, Montgomery County. The lot has approximately 104 feet of frontage on Bethlehem Pike and a depth of approximately 585 feet. A zoning district boundary line bisects the lot at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Morgan v. SbarbaroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Canter v. Township of Abington Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vanguard Cellular System, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Society Created to Reduce Urban Blight v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. LHT ASSOCIATES, LLC v. Township of HamptonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Myers v. State College Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Beecham Enterprises, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API