Karl Smith Development Co. v. Borough of Aspinwall
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Narick,
Karl Smith Development Company (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County.
The complicated procedural history giving rise to this appeal is as follows. In July of 1983, Appellant filed an action in mandamus in the court of common pleas. The complaint alleged that the Borough of Aspinwall, Robert T Mulvihill, the Chairman of the Borough Planning Commission and G. James Haberman, President of the Borough Council (collectively, Appellees) had issued Building Permit No. 1295 to Appellant for the erection of an 84-unit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Valley Forge Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Lindy Homes, Inc. v. SabatiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bakerstown Liquid Burners, Inc. v. Richland TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kutnyak v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Bird v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Belitskus v. Hamlin TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Dick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.